Payment proof for any EVM tx: success, block, UTC time, confirmations, sender, and every ERC-20 Transfer (token, symbol, decimals, from, to, exact raw + decimal amount) plus ERC-721 transfers, decoded from the receipt. Chains: base, ethereum, bsc, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, gnosis, celo.
Price per call0.005 USDC per call
published unit: per call
Calls · 30d—not reported by any source
Payers · 30d—
not reported by any source
Observed inflows · 30d
—
not attributable
Inflow growth · 7d
—
not comparable (baseline under $1 or window incomplete)
Examples are the provider's own, not a call we made.
Observed inflows · last 30 days
No inflow observed in this window
The payout address is also published by 10 other service(s); the volume cannot be attributed to one of them.
Observed inflows by window for Token transfers.
Window
Observed
Transfers
Last complete day (2026-10-28)
—
—
Last 7 days
—
—
Last 30 days
—
—
Growth, 7d against the 7 before
not comparable
Source: on-chain transfer scan (USDC on Base)Window: 2026-09-29 → 2026-10-28Scanned: 30/30 daysSample: 0 days with a transferFirst seen: neverLast update: 2026-10-28
The payout address is shared with 10 other service(s). That is normal for facilitator and platform addresses, and it is why this profile shows no inflow figure. The volume exists — it just cannot be split without inventing a rule.
Payment proof for any EVM tx: success, block, UTC time, confirmations, sender, and every ERC-20 Transfer (token, symbol, decimals, from, to, exact raw + decimal amount) plus ERC-721 transfers, decoded from the receipt. Chains: base, ethereum, bsc, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, gnosis, celo.
PayAI · Public discovery API (provider-published records)
Last checked
Not checked by us yet — the data is as the source published it
First seen
2026-10-26
Money, and what it actually proves
Verified revenue · 30dUnknown
Observed inflows · 30d—
AttributionShared
Receipt ledgerNot connected
Attribution blocked· confidence low
The payout address is also published by 10 other service(s); the volume cannot be attributed to one of them.
Why revenue is “unknown”. A revenue figure needs a receipt: an amount a buyer
actually paid for this service. We hold none for this entry, and we hold no funds at all.
What we have instead is
nothing measurable: no price, no attributable address, no receipt.
The payout address is also published by 10 other service(s); the volume cannot be attributed to one of them.
Daily market statistics — the ledger view, day by day
A payment rail is where the provider asks to be paid. It is not proof that anything was paid
through it. See evidence levels.
Provenance
One row per statement. “Verified” means we checked it ourselves and the finding is quoted.
“Provider claim” means we read it in the provider's own record. “Not found” is a statement about
our search, not proof of absence.
1 rail: Base · payee 0x5b4Ca59741DE12DC212982b342392a063492a021
Evidence
Aus den `accepts`-Einträgen: Netzwerk, Asset, Empfängeradresse und Betrag. Die Adresse ist die Grundlage der späteren On-Chain-Zuordnung; sie ist noch nicht durch eine eigene 402-Antwort bestätigt.
API recommendation and x402 discovery for your task. Required query: need. Which API should I call? Recommends which x402 API to use for any task, with evidence. Describe a task in plain words. Compare up to five paid AP...
OpenAI-compatible chat completions across the Venice AI model catalog. Pay per request in USDC on Base via x402, with no account and no API key. Overpayment is never lost: it banks as reusable wallet credit for your next...
Solana wallet risk screen via x402 (quick flag): service/router quarantine, bundler-routing hint, identity when covered, coverage and cached freshness. Low-cost first check before forensics, lineage or PnL. Not a live sc...